First off I'd like to point to this from The Times's report:
The FA has posted the commission’s full findings on its website in the interests of greater transparency in the disciplinary process, but this break from convention...What better example of bias could there be? The "break from convention" could only be for the reason that they found against us and that they call into question Evra's character, i.e. it's a great excuse to badmouth us.
I shall just put in one quote from the commission's report to demonstrate how much they hated on us:
The DVD evidence does not itself show whether or not Mr Evra actually struck MrBethell. It is just not clear enough. Mr Evra denies it but we accept Mr Bethell’s evidence that he was struck on or near his right ear and it was clearly Mr Evra who struck him."We have no evidence but hey, that Evra, he looks like a right liar." That seems to be the attitude of the commission. Brilliant reasoning. The whole Evra started everything no matter what anyone says attitude that runs throughout the report also suggests that they just hated on us from day one.
Great "independent" report.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment