Wasn't around to comment on the weekend's action, which was a shame, because there was a hell of a lot of bias going down. I won't rehash everything with links and detailed comment but the general tone of the coverage seemed to be rife with innuendo of the "well, Ronaldo may not have dived, but it was still Ronaldo, wasn't it? Eh? Eh?" kind. Frankly, after some of the decisions we've already had this season, it's about time we got something.
On to yesterday's action and there's nothing to get my teeth into at all today. The game was so easy that no one can be bothered to slag us off.
Best report comes from Daniel Taylor in The Guardian:
On to yesterday's action and there's nothing to get my teeth into at all today. The game was so easy that no one can be bothered to slag us off.
Best report comes from Daniel Taylor in The Guardian:
United should have had six, maybe even more. Ronaldo, in particular,The piece also contains the odd post-match comment from Sir Alex, but the most comprehensive source for comments comes in The Telegraph:
will wonder how his own performance did not include a goal. He and Nani
shimmered with menace on the wings, Rooney was alert and impressive and
Ryan Giggs, Scholes's replacement, delivered a masterclass in the
centre of midfield.
“Paul has ligament damage, but we don’t know how serious it is at
this stage,’’ Ferguson said. ‘‘It isn’t clear, but we think he has suffered
medial damage and we hope that’s all. He’ll be out for six to eight weeks,
though, so it’s a big price to pay.
No comments:
Post a Comment